September 8

HC Dynamo Moscow – CSKA Moscow

In the 60th minute of the game in Moscow, after an apparent goal scored by the home team, the guest team’s head coach requested a video review of the goal, claiming a possible goalie interference. The video review showed that HC Dynamo’s forward did not initiate contact with the goalie, therefore the referees correctly awarded a goal.

Dinamo Riga – Sibir Novosibirsk

In the 51th minute of the game in Riga, after a goal scored by the home team’s forward Linus Videll (#55), the Sibir head coach requested that the officials examine video footage of the goal for a possible offside. The video evidence shows that there was no offside, and thus a goal was awarded.

September 9

Slovan Bratislava – Lokomotiv Yaroslavl

In the 30th minute of the game in Bratislava, after an apparent goal scored by the guests’ player Danil Yurtaikin (#50), the home team’s head coach requested a video review of the goal, claiming a possible goalie interference. The video review showed that Lokomotiv’s forward initiated contact with the goalie before the puck crossed the line, and as a result, the goal was struck out.

Поделиться